The Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IBRAE) has set up an international commission to investigate the event. Its first meeting was held on 31 January 2018. IBRAE has published a short summary of this first meeting (Note: This link has disappeared. The report is now available at a higher news number as http://en.ibrae.ac.ru/newstext/915/. They stated that the total released activity is estimated at about 100 TBq. No conclusions on the source location are presented, but it is said that Rostechnadzor inspections were conducted at the PO "Mayak" and NIIAR (Dimitrovgrad) facilities covering the operations during the period August - November 2017, and no deviations from normal technological processes were found. The next meeting of the Commission is scheduled for April 11, 2018 in Moscow.
IRSN (French agency for radiological protection) has probably done the most comprehensive studies. They can be downloaded from the IRSN News page. The second, longer report (PDF) is very comprehensive and also contains a list of all available measurements as collected by IAEA.
The main content of this paper, including the latest hypothesis that the release may be related to the failed production of a Ce-144 source intended for neutrino measurements in the Gran Sasso lab, is summarised nicely on one page in a Science Magazine news article from 16 Feb 2018 (as PDF).
The German Federal Radiation Protection Agency BfS has also a useful BfS page on the Ru events.
The Russian news site geoenergetics.ru has published an article in Russian which has two lists of measurement results collected by the IAEA but originally not published so far (now they are in the IRSN report mentioned above) attached:
In the April 2018 EGU General Assembly, in the new Emergency response with atmospheric dispersion models session, there were three PICOs on the event:
In April 2018, the second meeting of the Commision has taken place. A short report on the 2nd Meeting (11 April) has been released by IBRAE. It states, inter alia,
According to a Reuters news information, the commission ... decided that its member groups ... could return to their countries and carry on their research independently, said Sweden.
O. Masson et al.: Airborne concentrations and chemical considerations of radioactive ruthenium from an undeclared major nuclear release in 2017, PNAS, 20 August 2019, 116(34), pp. 16750-16759, http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1907571116
O. Saunier, D. Didier, A. Mathieu, O. Masson, and J. Dumont Le Brazidec (2019): Atmospheric modeling and source reconstruction of radioactive ruthenium from an undeclared major release in 2017. PNAS,10 December 2019, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907823116
A further paper in Nature Communications (2020) presents evidence from ruthenium isotopic ratios on filters indicating that the ruthenium was part of fuel used in VVER reactors (which run in Russia and countries having been former Soviet allies):
T. Hopp, D, Zok. T. Kleine, G. Steinhauser (2020): Non-natural ruthenium isotope ratios of the undeclared 2017 atmospheric release consistent with civilian nuclear activities. Nature Communications>, 11:2744, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16316-3