Third-Party Funded Projects
Emotional Politics of Democracies (ENCODE)
Period: May 2024 - April 2027
Funded Horizon Europe
Amount: Euro 750k, with J. Matthes, A. Murugesan and A. Nanz
Abstract:
"The Emotional Politics of Democracies" (ENCODE) is an initiative under Horizon Europe which seeks to explore emotional dimensions in European democratic politics. It is set to run for three years, has a total budget of 2.9 million euro, and involves a consortium of ten organizations across eight European countries. The University of Vienna team is Jörg Matthes (PI), Anand Murugesan, Andreas Nanz, and Jean-Robert Tyran (co-PI). The team will study the interplay of emotions, democratic values, and resilience (WP5). Murugesan and Tyran will focus on emotions and democratic values (WP T5.2) and on emotions and democratic resilience (T5.3). They combine experimental methodologies with large-scale surveys to enhance the understanding and measurement of democratic resilience across ten European countries. The expected outcomes include an experimentally validated survey and a geographical heatmap of democratic resilience aiming to gather new insights into how emotions affect political behavior.
(more info will be posted on the project page)
Misperceptions about the welfare state: Immigration and health behavior
Period: Jan. 2024 - Dec. 2027
Funded: wwtf (ESS-2205)
Amount: Euro 341k, with C. Koch (PI)
Abstract: The welfare state is large and complex in modern societies. Its functioning is therefore difficult to grasp for citizens. Public support for the welfare state and public acceptance of its policies hinge on citizens’ perceptions – including their misperception – of the welfare state. The project focuses on the malleability of perceptions of the welfare state by implementing a randomized information intervention and to allow for a detailed analysis of heterogeneity in the population by combining data from a survey with register data. More specifically, we use an online survey from a representative sample of the adult Austrian voting population to elicit the effects of information interventions on the perception of factual characteristics, the perception of behavioral effects, and on fairness perceptions with a special emphasis on immigration- and health-related aspects of the welfare state. The combination of register and survey data allows us to provide a detailed picture of who knows and thinks what about the welfare state in Austria and whose perceptions can be swayed. We implement both positive and negative informational interventions to evaluate whether one-sided information campaigns can strengthen or undermine the support for the welfare state, and to study which groups in the voting population are most receptive to such information.
(more info will be posted on the project page)
Understanding social mobility – An experimental Approach
Period: Sept 2022 – Sept 2025
Funded: Austrian National Bank (project number 18633)
Amount: Euro 247’000, with Ada Kovaliukaite
Abstract: Social mobility evokes the meritocratic (“American”) dream of earning a better life through hard work, while lack of social mobility means that those at the bottom of the social ladder are doomed to remain there, no matter how hard they try. This project (i) experimentally investigates the relevance of the following structural determinants of social mobility: the degree to which success is driven by luck rather than effort, discrimination, wage compression, and the degree of social stratification. We then (ii) explore how different policy interventions such as income or inheritance taxes affect social mobility under varying structural conditions. We (iii) also investigate peoples’ acceptance of alternative policy measures by the means of voting. We develop an economic model with competition for status and accumulation effects which result from status-dependent access to production technologies. This model serves to generate benchmark predictions that we put to a test in the economic laboratory.
(more info will be posted on the project page)
Self-serving views on redistributive fairness
Period: Feb 2019 - Jan 2022
Funded by Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Amount: Euro 234'000, with Linda Desző
Abstract: Experimental research on distributive preferences reports that people prefer compensating low income through redistribution when it is due to factors one cannot control. However, there are situations where partners’ incomes were previously unequal, while in a new, present income allocation they receive equal outcomes. Only one paper examines a similar situation, finding that the person with the unfortunate history self-servingly believes that he is entitled to compensation for his past, while the person with the fortunate history believes that the past is irrelevant to the present. We propose an agenda investigating how history shapes distributive preferences, and the association between distributive fairness violations and unethical behavior. We argue that examining the relationship between history and distributive preferences sheds light, for example, on whether a fair welfare system should consider individual contribution history.
First, we ask if asymmetric contribution history to joint earnings leads to self-serving invocations of history between partners when proposing divisions.
Second, we address whether partners sharing asymmetric initial income levels due to a previous allocation hold divergent views about the fair distribution of new, jointly created proceeds to which they contributed
equally. We study the extent to which preferences for maintaining income hierarchy and inequality aversion (beyond greed) drive distributive preferences.
Relatedly, we examine the association between imposing a distributive scheme on the rich and poor and subsequent unethical behavior. Imposed distributive schemes would systematically vary how much post-distribution rank is maintained/reversed and how income inequality is decreased/increased between them
Evaluation of soft measures to promote student success
Period: 2016 - 2019
Funded by Ministry of Education, University of Vienna
Amount: Euro 300'000, with Axel Sonntag
Abstract: The aim of this research project is to systematically evaluate various "soft" measures implemented by the University of Vienna to promote student success. Measures are called "soft" if they do not entail regulations for students or are based on economic incentives like sanctions or rewards. Therefore, students are not coerced or constrained by soft measures and remain entirely free to choose the pace and sequence of their studies as if the measures were not present. Soft measures are also cheap to implement. Typical examples of such measures are reminders of important deadlines or providing online tools for planning coursework. To evaluate the effectiveness of such measures, the University plans to implement a series of soft measures at different times in different faculties. Not all students will therefore experience the same measures at the same time. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine which measures are particularly effective such that they can be used to the benefit of all students.
Fairness, personal responsibility, and the welfare state
Period: January 2015 - December 2018
Funded by NORFACE (EU), Project number: 462-14-033
Amount: Euro 250’000 (Austrian Part), Austrian team: Axel Sonntag, Peter Bednarik
Abstract: The aim of the research project ”Fairness, personal responsibility and the welfare state” is to analyze how fairness considerations, in particular with respect to personal responsibility, affect the support and effectiveness of welfare policies. The European welfare states are faced with important challenges, in particular related to financial strains on the welfare system, changing migration flows and increasing inequality. Partly as a response to these challenges, there is an increasing focus on personal responsibility. The proposed research project provides new knowledge about how the welfare states can meet these challenges and how concerns for personal responsibility can be integrated in the design of welfare schemes in a way that is perceived as fair.
Four research teams from Norway, the Netherlands, and Austria, take a cross-disciplinary perspective on fairness and use an innovative combination of methods, including administrative register data, surveys, as well as field and laboratory experiments. Other teamleaders: Norway: Alexander Cappelen (NHH Bergen), Stein Kuhnle (U Bergen), Sigrid Suetens (U Tilburg)
Representative Democracy: Theory and Experiments
Period: September 2014 - August 2017
Funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG, Project Number: WA3559/1-1
with Alexander K. Wagner
Abstract: This proposal incorporates insights from psychology into economic reasoning to better understand political processes and outcomes in representative democracy. In terms of academic disciplines, the proposal is located at the crossroads of economics, psychology and political science, and in terms of method it is grounded in both theory and experiment. Economic reasoning will be used to investigate how rational and self-interested politicians change their behaviour when voters are forgetful, inattentive and have limited foresight. This approach starts from the well-defined benchmark of rational choice theory and adds psychological realism to how voters are modelled. The theoretical investigation is expected to yield clear and testable predictions. These predictions are tested in a controlled laboratory setting. The general aim is to provide an empirically grounded model of the political process and to inform us when we need to be careful in advancing conclusions from rationalistic models.
Experimental Markets with Search Frictions and Network Externalities
Project duration: Jan. 2012 - Dec. 2015
Funded by Norwegian Research Council, no. 212996/F10
Amount: Euro 70’000, with Leif Helland, Espen Moen
Abstract: The project designs and analyzes experimental markets with search costs, and experimental markets with network externalities. The aim is to understand: i) the conditions under which markets with network externalities may lead to coordination failure and lock in, and ii) the conditions under which markets with search costs converge to / diverge from the behavior predicted by search theory.
Experimental Investigations of Labor Markets
Period: September 2008 – February 2015Funded by Austrian Science Fund (no. S10307)
Amount: Euro 350’000, with Rupert Sausgruber
Abstract: The project integrates recent findings in behavioral economics into traditional labor economics. We explore questions regarding labor supply and the provision of effort, including the analysis of incentive effects of taxation and redistribution on effort and the cognitive perception of the incentive effects. In addition, we make contributions to study cooperation in self-governed environments, the political acceptance of reform, and aspects of discrimination in the labor market. We have initiated research to explore behavior in markets with asymmetric information, the measurement and determinants of motivation at work, gender sorting, and the effect of solidarity on social mobility. We have conducted conventional lab experiments with student subjects, large-scale internet experiments with participants form the general population, and have conducted natural field experiments.
iLEE: Internet-based platform for research in Economics
Period: 2007 - 2011
Funded by Carlsberg Foundation
Amount: Euro 1'180'000
Abstract: The purpose of the project is to develop a novel platform for research in Economics (which was later called iLEE: internet Laboratory for Experimental Economics). It serves to conduct large-scale experiments with participants from all walks of life from the Danish population over the internet. Controlled laboratory experiments have been used with much success in economics to investigate a wide range of economic choices. They allow to infer causal effects and motives for particular choices which is often fraught with difficulties if not impossible in the field. Such controlled experiments have traditionally been conducted in an experimental laboratory and with undergraduate students. Because iLEE uses a "virtual lab" approach, it enables us to conduct controlled and incentivized experiments over the internet and our collaboration with Statistics Denmark allows us to recruit people from all walks of life about whom we have very detailed statistical information from official registers.