mahr'svierteljahrsschriftfürästhetik
7
(2004), Nr.3/September
Aesthetica. 1. Abstract of
„Das Metaxy der Aisthesis.
Aristoteles' ‘De anima’ als eine Ästhetik mit Bezug
zu den Medien“, published in: Wiener Jahrbuch für
Philosophie XXXV (2003), pp.25-58. 2002 Characters.
The paper claims that elements
of philosophical aesthetics and of philosophy of the media can be found in
Aristotle's ‘De anima’ and that these findings give further rise to pursue a
theory of the aesthetic of the media. This aesthetics, under the premise of aesthetics
in the modern latin sense,
is entertained by the stunning vicinity of the De anima’s passages concerning
media theory and its passages concerning aesthetics respectively. For arriving there
the paper first attempts to make a case of Aristotle’s remarks in DA concerning
aesthetic affects, art, music, proportion, aesthetic objects, and aesthetic
well-being. These aspects of aisthesis tyed together provide evidence for DA’s not intended revolving
round a philosophy of the beautiful in nature and the arts and the sensing
appropriate to it. Secondly are traced Aristotle’s notions or usage (of the
words) of metaxù, méson/mesótes
and diaphanés, all of them signifying an in-between
between object and perception (air, water) as is indispensible
for the process of (aesthetic) aísthesis and the
understanding of it. The paper’s two claims rest on indications since it does not
dispose of systematic interpretation (yet?) including the metaphysical
framework of Aristotle. It does not contribute to a full theory of material/technical
media – it is because of ancient téchne that Aristotle
practically and theoretically could not have thought of media as perceptual in
the modern physical sense, not to speak of art media in the modern aesthetic
sense. In focusing on a minute reading of De anima as well as studying the
literature on Aristotle and aesthetics since the 19th century the paper
concludes in the recommendation of examining today’s technologically refined
physical/perceptual media within an aesthetic perspective as provided by what
Aristotle delivers with the margins of DA’s main business. This examination
could well enhance a theory of an aesthetic medium proper and thereby
additionally give insight into the materiality of (aesthetic) communication.
Inspired by a title of Philippe Quéau the paper draws
more than encouragement from various sources like the RomeyerDerbey/Viano-Reader (Sur
le De Anima d'Aristote, 1996), Aristotle indices (Bonitz, Hicks) and current research in the philosophy of
the media done by Paul Virilio, Sybille Krämer, Jean-Luc Nancy, and others.
Peter Mahr © 2004
back to top of page: Rhizography
back to:
Letter