- 29 -
Study of 27Al and 24Fe(p,xγ) reactions at Ep = 800
MeV
H. Vonach, A. Pavlik. and A. Wallner
Institut fürRadiumforschung und Kernphysik, University of Vienna
A-1090
M. Drosg
Intitut für Experimentalphysik.
R. C. Haight and D. M. Drake
Los Alamos, NM 87545. U.S.A.
Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Tokai-mura, Ibaraki-ken 319-11.
Spallation of 27Al
and 54Fe by 800 MeV protons was investigated at the WNR-facility of
the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Production cross sections for a
considerable number of residual nuclei were determined for both targets by use
of three different methods
The mass and
charge distributions of the reaction products from Spallation reactions induced
by protons in the energy range from several hundred MeV to several GeV had been
investigated in a number of experiments (see, e.g , Ref 1) Cross sections for
the formation of radioactive residual nuclei with half-lives exceeding some
hours have been investigated by conventional y-ray spectroscopy and accelerator
mass spectrometry (AMS), the production of stable isotopes of noble gases has
been measured by gas production measurements and mass analysis. Much less
information, however, exists about the production of stable isotopes from
elements other than noble gases, and for short-lived residual nuclei. Only one
experiment has been reported, in which the full mass and charge distribution of
the spallation products has been measured by detection of the recoiling nuclei
in so-called inverse kinematics at E = 600 MeV [2]. Although the results
of this experiment are in reasonable overall agreement with the above mentioned
activation, AMS and gas production measurements, there are a number of discrepancies exceeding experimental errors [1 ]
The present experiment
was performed using in-beam y-ray spectroscopy This method, which so far has
not been used in the study of spallation reactions, allows the determination of
cross sections for formation of stable and very short-lived isotopes, both of
which cannot be measured by conventional activation techniques Two nuclei, 27Al
and 54Fe, have been selected for this study because they have been
studied before in a number of papers [1,2]
These nuclei are well suited for the goal of obtaining a rather complete
mass and charge distribution of the residual nuclei by combining our results
with the existing data base In addition, checks of the results obtained by very
different methods become possible for a number
of residual nuclei.
Thin foils of 27A1
and 54Fe (6.82 ±0.27
mg/cm2 and 12.13 ±0.24 mg/cm2)
were irradiated with the 800 MeV proton beam of the WNR facility of the Los
Alamos National Laboratory [3]. The y-radiation from the proton-induced
reactions was observed with a high-purity Ge-detector The
foils were irradiated in a scattering chamber located in the beam line from the
accelerator to the neutron producing target of WNR.
-
30 -
The γ-radiation from
the targets was measured with a high-purity Ge-detector at a distance of about
30 m from the targets at an angle of 150° relative to the proton beam. The WNR
beam consisted of 40 macro-pulses per second separated by either 16 66 or 33 33
ms Each macro-pulse had a length of 600 ms.
Within each macro-pulse the beam consisted of narrow micro-pulses of a
width of about 1 ns at intervals of 1 8 us Accordingly the prompt Y-radiation
originating from the so-called γ-cascade deexciting the final residual
nucleus was observed by its time correlation to the micro-pulses The
γ-radiation from the decay of the short-lived residual nuclei formed in
spallation reactions was measured between the macro-pulses by setting a time
window of 15 ms after the end of each «micro-pulse. After the experiment the
irradiated Al and Fe foils were transferred to the Institut für Radiumforschung
und Kernphysik in
The present data as well
as the results of all previous measurements were compared with the predictions
of the semi-empirical systematics of Tsao and Silberberg [4] and with
calculations according to the quantum molecular dynamics model (QDM) followed
by statistical decay (SDM) [5,6].
The quality of the
theoretical description by the QMD model is approximately as good as that of
the semi-empirical systematics, although the QMD model does not contain any
parameters fitted to the existing data on nuclide production cross section.
However, there are still deviations up to a factor of two between the
experimental data and both calculations even for nuclides in the peaks of the
mass distribution. Especially the QMD-model seems to underestimate the
production of nuclides with masses very close to the target nucleus e.g 55Fc
or 55Mn from 56Fe, which may be caused by some direct
reaction mechanisms not included in the QMD-model Unfortunately the overall
spread even of the more recent data is still so large that it is difficult to
draw general conclusions on possible systematic dependencies of the observed
discrepancies on Z and A.
References
1. R. Michel et
al., .Nucl.Inst.Meth B 103. 183 (1995)
2. W. R. Webber. J C Kishand D A Schrier. Phys. Rev. C41. 547 (1990)
3. P. W. Lisowski.C.
D. Bowman. G J Russell and S A Wender. Nucl.Sci.Eng.
106, 208 (1990)
4. R.
Silberberg and C. H. Tsao, Astrophys J 220. 315, 335 (1973); R. Silberberg, C. H. Tsao and M. M.Shapiro. in Spallation Nuclear Reactions and Their
Applications. eds. B. S. P. Shen and M. Merker (Reidel. Dordrecht.
1976) p. 49, C. H. Tsao and R. Silberberg. Proc.16th Cosmic Ray Conf (Kyoto. 1979) vol 2. p. 202; R. Silberberg.
C. H. Tsao and J. R. Letaw. Ap J Suppl Ser 58
873 (I985), R. Silberberg, C. H. Tsao and J. R. Letaw. 20th
Int Cosmic Ray Conf. (Moscow. 1987) vol 2. p 133
5. K Niifa et al. Phys. Rev C 52. 2620 (1995).
6. S Chiba et al. Phys Rev C 54. 285 (1996)