homepage: MARTIN  POTSCHKA Email: martin.potschka@univie.ac.at
t

PROJECTS

BAR include

current Projects:

old projects

cv

research interest

publications

links

dates & events

opinions

software

search

archive

home

 

 

EVOLUTION 

   call for contributions to a book on:

 Neodarwinian Logic

 

The book will be developed from the contributions of the ISSEI workshop at Malta (see below) with additional contributions solicited, produced  under the tentative book title: Neodarwinian logic.

The tentative set of paradigms that I propose to represent Neodarwinian logic (subject to criticism and modification) may be summarized as follows:

1.      Existence of agents.

2.      Heredity.

3.      Variation (and accumulation of mutations).

4.      Non-constancy of species (corollary to #3).

5.      Cooperation (emerges via variation and selection).

6.      Branching evolution from a single unique origin  (corollary to #5).

7.      Hierarchical organization and compartmentalization of hereditary base (emerges via variation and selection).

8.      Evolution has a direction, is gradual(?) and provides limited optimisation

9.      Selection (survival of the fittest) in isolation (in isolated populations).

The principal aim of the book is to present a generalization of the neodarwinian priciples beyond the field of genetic evolution.  Relevant phenomena (from the field of sociology and the humanities, as well as non-genetic biological processes) are not primarely reduced to genetics, but analyzed in respect to formal (mathematical) properties. It furthermore seeks to provide an answer to the questions that recently have been raised by Cardinal Schönborn on behalf of the catholic church. It will present an uncompromising evaluation of theological and scientific  arguments without claiming a final consensus.

Thus the book will include chapters grouped into three categories:
1. the state of the art in evolutionary biology; key issues of genetic inheritance
2. the application of the paradigm/method/logic to other fields of study; a cross-section of occurances and applications of neodarwinian logic in all scientific disciplines
3. the religious deminension: why is darwinism rejected, what religious arguments are there to modify scientific theory and what epistemological status do such claims have (are they supported by experiments, by
introspection, or predicted on grounds of theoretical consistence ?...); all world regions in their opinions about Darwinism will be covered

Within the above list of contributions special consideration will be given to the following timely issues:

  • different types of cooperation (hypercycle, centrifugal vs centralist forces, hierachies, biodiversity, monopolisation, ...)

  • discontent with the concept of chance (chance, choice and necessity; Darwinian chance vs. dialectical negation; popperian evolutution and intelligent design; causa finalis?, ....)

  • matter, mind, and the role of God (the coevolution of consciousness; God being subject to his inner evolutionary processes, parapsychology, ...)

  • methodological considerations (the narrative and contextual character of both science and scriptures; the methods of religion, science, the law, etc.; structuralism ...)

  • Neodarwinian logic and Dialectic logic; its application to culture and cultural products (comparative literature, ...)

  • Neodarwinian logic in biology (genetics, immunology, higher order structural protein assembly); specific issues of the gene based system (molecular evolution in the test tube, beyond gradualism, group selection, generative entrenchment and evolutionary developmental biology, criteria of fitness, the evolution of the eye,...)

This list may be enlarged as further propositions come in. 

In detail the book includes all aspects of the original call for the Malta workshop presented below, but focuses specifically on the logic of neodarwinism, i.e. a set of paradigms. It will investigate modes related to neodarwinian logic rather than metaphors.Contributing papers discuss the application and limits of these paradigms in a variety of of disciplines (philosophy, economics, social sciences, liguistics immunology, brain research, informatics, poetry, the arts, ...), they present the evidences that support these paradigms in the field of life sciences (molecular in vitro models of evolution, paleontology, non-coding DNA, genetic regulation of morphogenesis, what's the problem about reverse translatases, tubulin assembly, ant foraging behavior, ...), they provide a comparison of different evolution models, they discuss the evolution of intelligence, they discuss the relation of science and religion, present theological arguments concerning evolution from the point of view of different denominations and creeds (modern textual criticism in exegetics, process-theology, feminist theology, comparative studies for Islam, Judaism and Buddhism, ...), they present the history of the evolution - creation struggle in the USA with emphasis on high school teaching, they present tangential information from other fields of science like parapsychology (mental manipulation of chance events, ...), and more.

The presentations of the book should help scholars at the postgraduate level to understand the problems and language of other dispciplines in respect to the common theme of the book without having formal training in them. Thus the book should enable professionals to understand the state of the research in other fields and to communicate in a transdisciplinary manner across existing discouse boundaries. The editor believes there is both lack of theological understanding among scientists and lack of scientific understanding among theologians and philosophers. The book should bridge this gap. It is  not primarily written for the lay person and does not intend to popularize the subject, yet without excluding anyone who enjoys to read a professional text.

If you are interested to contribute an article to this book, please contact:

martin.potschka@univie.ac.at

 

 

 

tentative chapters of the book:

participants email title

1)

Martin Potschka

   

Vienna, Austria martin.potschka@univie.ac.at Introduction

2)

Martin Potschka

   

Vienna, Austria martin.potschka@univie.ac.at Intelligent design does not contradict neodarwinian logic [.pdf]

3)

Gonzalo Munévar

   

Lawrence Technological University, USA munevar@ltu.edu Intelligence and Natural Selection [.pdf]

4)

Jane W. Cormuss  

 

Boston University, USA jcormuss@bu.edu Visions of creation in the late modern age [.pdf]

5)

Alexey V. Gomankov

 

Komarov Botanical Institute, St. Petersburg,
Russia
gomankov@mail.ru
Russia, the Orthodox Church and evolution theory 

6)

Martin Riexinger

 

University Göttingen, Germany mriexin@gwdg.de Neodarwinism and Islam 

7)

Franz Schwediauer

Vienna, Austria schwedi@utanet.at Jewish Mysticism

8)

Susantha Goonatilake

Sri Lanka susanthag@hotmail.com Buddhism, Evolution, Process theory

9)

Rod Hemsell  

 

Auroville (Unesco), India rodhemsell@yahoo.com Sri Aurobindo  and the Philosophy of Evolution [.pdf]

10)

Roland Faber  

 

Claremont School of Theology, USA RFaber@cst.edu  Process theology [.pdf]

11)

David L. Hull  

 

Northwestern University,
Evanston, USA
david.lee.hull@etss.net  Neodarwinian Logic: Analogy or General Analysis? [.pdf]

12)

Filomena de Sousa  

 

Université du Québec ŕ Montréal, Canada d336354@er.uqam.ca Evolutionary Approaches in Economics: Scope and Models [.pdf]

13)

Tamás Meleghy / Heinz-Jürgen Niedenzu

 

University of Innsbruck, Austria Heinz-Juergen.Niedenzu@uibk.ac.at The Relevance of Evolutionary Theory for the Social Sciences [.pdf]

14)

Tamás Meleghy / Heinz-Jürgen Niedenzu

 

University of Innsbruck, Austria Heinz-Juergen.Niedenzu@uibk.ac.at The Evolutionary Foundations of Human Rationality: on Norbert Elias and Stephen K. Sanderson [.pdf]

15)

Vladimir Degtiar

Moscow, Russia degtiar@orc.ru The Role of Evolutionary Mechanisms for Social Systems Development [.pdf]

16)

Peter Schuster (confirmation pending)

University of Vienna, Austria peter.schuster@univie.ac.at Evolution under controlled conditions and laboratory experiments
[.pdf]

17)

Scott H. Podolsky

 New York, USA spodolsky@partners.org Clonal Selection Theory and the Neo-Darwinian
Transformation of Immunology

18)

Gonzalo Munévar

Lawrence Technological University, USA munevar@ltu.edu The Evolution of the Eye: A
Philosopher's Critique of Intelligent Design [.pdf]

19)

Dirk Vanderbeke

University of Greifswald, Germany
Vanderbeke@t-online.de Of Dinos, Neanderthals and the Postcolonial Other: A Case Study of Scientific Evolution [.pdf]

20)

Gábor Á Zemplén

 

Max Planck Institute for History of Science, Berlin, Germany

gzemplen@mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de

Evolution theory in the court room [.pdf]

 


 

The first step to realize this project was the following workshop:

 

 

“The European Mind: Narrative and Identity”

10th Conference of the International Society for the Study of European Ideas (ISSEI)

in cooperation with the University of Malta,

Malta; 24 – 29 July, 2006

 

Prof. Dr.Stanley Shostak

Workshop Co-Chair

Department Biological Sciences, retired

Univ. of Pittsburgh
Tel: + Fax.: +1-412-4210504

email: sshostak@pitt.edu

http://www.pitt.edu/~sshostak/

Dr. Martin Potschka

Workshop Co-Chair

Porzellangasse 19-2-9

Vienna, Austria A-1090

Tel. + Fax.: +43-1-317.5713

email: martin.potschka@univie.ac.at

http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Martin.Potschka/

 

Call for Papers

 

workshop:   The science and history of evolutionary theory

  

In the United States, high (secondary) school education is virtually compulsory. Teenage students are forced to learn and submit to examination on a doctrine deemed sacrilegious by many Christian fundamentalists. Consequently, teaching evolution is widely resented and frequently resisted through efforts of democratically elected officials. Recently, efforts to remove evolution from high school curricula or delineate its scope have been rebuffed by the courts without recognizing the legitimate concern of parents to supervise the moral education of their children. Intelligent design remains an academic research agenda. While it may be premature to expose Secondary school students with unexplored ideas, it remains worthwhile to academically examine such ideas. Rather than furthering the scientific study of evolution, controversy has been an impediment. We propose, therefore, to promote evolutionary studies by launching a range of useful new debates:

 

1)      Trial and error are minimalistic requirements to bootstrap complexity, and hence should also be the initial stages in the development of intelligence. Hence regardless of whether we have understood speciation in full, the structuralistic principle of Darwinism remains applicable even if we engage intelligence.

2)      cultural evolution operates with higher complexities and possibly different mechanisms that remain to be specified.

3)      By scientific standards Intelligent design postulates a deus-ex-machina without thusfar providing mechanisms of interference with the genetic apparatus and without explaining intelligence itself.

4)      How have art, intelligence, rituals and fetishism evolved: what are their sources and what are the conditions for their development?

5)      Are science and religion complementary descriptions of the world, and are their epistemologies compatible?

 

The organizers invite papers in any of the above categories. Please contact:

martin.potschka@univie.ac.at or sshostak@pitt.edu  

Deadline for submissions is: 15th April 2006. deadline extended to 15th May 2006

Your contributions will be published in the conference proceedings; manuscripts should not exceed 3000 words (approx. 10 pages).

For information about the conference, registration, travel directions etc. see: http://issei2006.haifa.ac.il

Program Malta 2006: ISSEI workshop “evolution”

Thursday 27th July PM 1:30 – 5:30(Room 206) ; 

continued on Friday 28th July AM 9:30 – 12:30 (Room 164)

participants

email

title

0)

Gonzalo Munévar

 

Lawrence Technological University, USA

munevar@ltu.edu

Introduction (A Philosopher’s Critique of Intelligent Design) [.pdf]

1)

Martin Potschka

 

Vienna, Austria

martin.potschka@univie.ac.at

The roman catholic church and evolution theory [.pdf]

2)

Rod Hemsell

 

Auroville (Unesco), India

rodhemsell@yahoo.com

Sri Aurobindo  and the Philosophy of Evolution [.pdf]

3)

Filomena de Sousa

 

Université du Québec ŕ Montréal, Canada

d336354@er.uqam.ca

Evolutionary Approaches in Economics: Scope and Models [.pdf]

4)

Tamás Meleghy / Heinz-Jürgen Niedenzu

 

University of Innsbruck, Austria

Heinz-Juergen.Niedenzu@uibk.ac.at

The Relevance of Evolutionary Theory for the Social Sciences [.pdf]

5)

Tamás Meleghy / Heinz-Jürgen Niedenzu

 

University of Innsbruck, Austria

Heinz-Juergen.Niedenzu@uibk.ac.at

The Evolutionary Foundations of Human Rationality: on Norbert Elias and Stephen K. Sanderson [.pdf]

6)

Gonzalo Munévar

 

Lawrence Technological University, USA

munevar@ltu.edu

Intelligence and Natural Selection [.pdf]

0)

all participants

 

 

 

Closing discussion on “current frontiers in evolution theory”

On Thursday 27th July evening: workshop dinner (details will be announced in the workshop afternoon session)


CONFERENCE

paper presented at the slsa meeting:

Potschka, Martin [2006] The roman catholic church and evolution theory: Intelligent design does not contradict Neodarwinian logic [.pdf]

 

 


Some general information on the subject of Evolution 

 

The debate of evolution in the Roman Catholic Church:

Pope John Paul II has called Evolution theory "more than a hypothesis". According to the judgment of the International Harald Tribune, Cardinal Schönborn denied that John Paul II had accepted the possibility of evolution. He certainly does not accept some of  the implications of his message and there  he gets assistence by physicist Herbert Pietschmann who claims that scientific theories always are mere hypothesis. What is truth, what is a hypothesis? (this epistemological quirl is one of the issues discussed in the article by Martin Potschka, other aspects are:. Is evolution theory complete? Is there intelligence in the universe? and how did intelligence evolve?)

John Paul II, Truth cannot contradict truth, Address to the pontifical academy of sciences 22. October 1996, L'Osservatore Romano (english edition) October 30th 1996. http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Martin.Potschka/papers/Evolution-pope.pdf

Schönborn, Christoph, Finding Design in Nature, New York Times July 7, 2006. http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Martin.Potschka/papers/Evolution-NYT.pdf

Potschka, Martin, Wo bleibt die Evolution der Intelligenz?, Der Standard 3. Dezember 2005, S. 40. http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Martin.Potschka/papers/Evolution-DerStandard2.pdf

  

 


 

Teaching Evolution in high schools:

 

Brumfiel, Geoff, School board in court over bid to teach intelligent design: Parents fight decision to include intelligent creator in science lessons, Nature, Published online: 28 September 2005; | doi:10.1038/437607b
http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Martin.Potschka/papers/Brumfiel-Dover2.pdf 

Dover Decision, On December 20 2005 Judge John E. Jones III ruled in favor of the parents who sought to prevent the incorporation of intelligent design, a religious concept, into science lessons on evolution. Click here to read Judge Jones's 139-page decision [http://coop.www.uscourts.gov/pamd/kitzmiller_342.pdf]

Matsumura,  Molleen; Mead,  Louise [] "10 Major Court Decisions against Teaching Creationism as Science", National Center for Science Education. Click here to read  [http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/1464_10_major_court_decisions_again_2_15_2001.asp]

Working Group on Teaching Evolution, National Academy of Sciences [1998] Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science, Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 

 


 

Creationism:

 

Brooke, John Hedley, A secular religion: should evolutionism be viewed as a modified descendant of Christianity?, a review of the book "The Evolution-Creation Struggle" by Michael Ruse, Nature 437 (2005) 815-816.
http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Martin.Potschka/papers/Ruse-review2.pdf 

Rennie, John, 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense, Scientific American July 2002: 78-85.
http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Martin.Potschka/papers/Rennie_Creationism_SciAm_0702078C.pdf 

Johnson, Phillip E. [1991] Darwin on Trial,  Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press; 1993.

Whitcomb, John C. and Henry M. Morris, The Genesis Flood: The Biblical
Record and its Scientific Implications
, Foreword by John C. McCampbell.
Phillipsburgh, NJ: P&R Publishing; 1961.

Morris, Henry M., and Gary E. Parker, What is Creations Science?, Revised and Expanded, Green Forest, AR: Master Books, Inc.; 1982.

Morris, Henry M., ed., Scientific Creationism, Prepared by the
technical staff and consultants of the Institute for Creation Research.
Green Forest, AR: Master Books, Inc.; 1974.

 

 


 

Topics in evolution theory:

 

Potschka, Martin, Evolutionstheorie. Die Wiegen der Menschlichkeit. Neue Theorien über Anfang und Evolution der Menschheit, Volksstimme 27 (1994) 20.
http://homepage.univie.ac.at/Martin.Potschka/papers/VS5.pdf 

Rice, William R., Salt, George W., The evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character under sympatric conditions - experimental evidence, Evolution 44 (1990) 1140-1152.

Rice, William R., Hostert Ellen E., Laboratory Experiments on speciation - what we learned in 40 years, Evolution 47 (1993) 1637-1653.

Stostak,  Seth, SETI and Intelligent Design,  http://www.space.com/searchforlife/seti_intelligentdesign_051201.html

 


 


 

Useful Links:

 

The American Institute of
Biological Sciences

 

last update:  26. 4.07